Tate: They're going nowhere fast
CHAMPAIGN — The season's first sellout crowd — 60,670 — didn't help.
What they saw was an Illini collapse that had Ron Zook befuddled as the losing streak reached four.
"We've got to get our offense going, and I'm not exactly sure how we're going to do it," puzzled the Illini coach. "I thought we'd play lights out. We moved the ball in the two-minute mode, but we never got the running game going."
Illinois, once a rushing leader among Big Ten teams, netted 37 yards on 33 carries while Michigan's darting halfback, Fitzgerald Toussaint, rattled off 192 in a decisive 31-14 verdict. QB star Denard Robinson added 30 before sitting out most of the second half with a wrist injury.
Illinois hasn't scored in the first 41 minutes of the last four games, didn't reach the 50-yard line Saturday until the last two minutes of the third quarter and, for the fourth straight game, didn't get a field goal from standout kicker Derek Dimke.
It left the early-departing crowd grumbling ever more about Zook's failures (34-49 in nearly seven seasons) and wondering out loud whether freshman Reilly O'Toole deserves a longer shot at QB. These are, of course, routine gripes throughout the football world where losing coaches are hammered and second-team quarterbacks are always the campus favorite. But the outcry becomes louder every Saturday.
Early hole
Illinois was fresh after a week off, and Michigan arrived carrying bruises from a 24-16 loss at Iowa.
But Michigan's fast-moving offensive line systematically chopped Illinois to pieces early, the eager hosts over-running Toussaint and allowing productive cutbacks. The sophomore sprinted 65 yards in the first series to set the tone.
"We had people there all day and it was like tackling a ghost," defensive coordinator Vic Koenning said. "We've been getting away with blitzes, and we didn't today. We had the right coverage when they made it 24-7 (a 27-yard catch by Martavious Odoms). They crossed receivers into a rotating zone, but our safety went the wrong way. We made mistakes, and we missed tackles."
Actually, the Illini dodged multiple bullets when backed down in the second quarter. Michigan was repulsed at the 1-yard line, lost a fumble after reaching the 13 and missed a field goal after penetrating to the 19. Michigan kept the pressure on. Illinois, meanwhile, appeared weaker than ever up front with guard Hugh Thornton sidelined and had only a solitary first down at halftime. Nuff said.
On the block
How many times do you see a basketball box score with more blocks (13) than turnovers (12)?
Those were the UI's numbers Friday as Bruce Weber tested a revised lineup with 7-1 Meyers Leonard and 6-11 Nnanna Egwu side by side on the frontline. OK, it's true that Loyola played two forwards and no centers, so it's too early for conclusions.
But it's worthy of an extended look. Weber hasn't employed this combination much in practice. The lankies usually go against each other. But there was something intimidating to see them together because they play extremely high, they're both racehorses, and they're just beginning to mature.
The question is whether these two can stay out of foul trouble long enough to play at the same time. Prior to Friday, it was presumed they would sub for each other.
Costly losses
As a follow-up to the report on the UI's financial emphasis on women's basketball over volleyball, Friday provided the following numbers:
Kevin Hambly's team downed Penn State in straight sets before 3,905 feverish fans in an uproarious atmosphere at Huff.
Earlier Friday, the basketball team was routed by South Carolina at the Assembly Hall. At halftime, the Illini's turnover-to-assist ratio was 11-1. The Illini clung within 36-31 early in the second half but quickly swooned to the extent of trailing by 30.
As for the turnout, I was seated on the east side and counted all the fans on the opposite side. The number was 125. It was similar on my side. Let's estimate the total at 300-plus ... in a frigid atmosphere that won't have the fire marshals concerned.
And Jolette Law's team soon will travel to Oregon, California, Clemson, San Juan and Las Vegas, which is no small expense.
Tate's tidbits
— If Penn State is looking for a cleanup savior to salve a ripped-up campus, the university needs to look no further than Stan Ikenberry, who completed a similar task at Illinois. Ikenberry isn't looking for a job, but he is the perfect fit.
— Most relieved coach in America: That would be Ed DeChellis, who left a severely weakened Penn State basketball program to conclude his coaching days at Navy ... where he peacefully watches the yachts coming into the harbor while the furor grows in Unhappy Valley.
— Michigan State's lack of depth was apparent in the 67-55 loss to North Carolina aboard the USS Carl Vinson. Tom Izzo's reserves went 4 for 20 from the field.
— The UI's loss at Purdue doesn't look so bad. The Boilermakers are 5-1 at home after upsetting Ohio State, their only home loss coming to Notre Dame.
Mood check
Why I Feel Young ...
Actually, I don’t. I hit bottom on a 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. Friday. Shouldn’t have worked out that morning. Checked in at the office, chased down Loyola coach Porter Moser, more Penn State talk at lunch, a student interview, the women’s basketball game at 3:30, quick trip to entertain dinner guests at the I Hotel, and a busy night of basketball at the Hall. Home at 11, asleep at 11:10. Don’t ask about Saturday.
Why I Feel Old ...
See associated paragraph. Girls, how about a respirator for Christmas?
Loren Tate writes for The News-Gazette. He can be reached at ltate@news-gazette.com.
Face it. The head coach is responsible for the success of the team. However, Loren points out the incredibly poor performance of our offense in the last four games and never mentions the offensive coordinator who is calling the plays. If we do not have a good line, why not run some roll out passes with a qb who can run? Why not run some screen passes? If you have a qb on the bench who can throw and one on the field who can run, why not put them out there together and make the defense think about reverses, etc.? Also, you are down 17 points and working against the clock and you have you waste 10 -15 seconds on every play with your qb looking to the sideline for a final play to becalled after going up to the line of scrimmage. What's the value of the no huddle offense if you take 25 seconds to call a play??? We have more problems than just at the head coaching position.
You are right. It's not only Zook, but the whole coaching staff needs to go along with him. Our high priced coordinators have both failed in their play calling and coaching along with Zook and on top of it now we're recruiting bottom of the barrel 2 star talent which just isn't going to cut it against recruiting powerhouses OSU, UM, PSU, Wisconsin and MSU. Even middle of pack Purdue dominated Illini this year and Minnesota has a good chance to beat Illinois. Time to clean house and fire the whole coaching staff and get a good proven head coach in here and let him bring his top assistants. Pay a top head coach whatever dollars it takes. Illinois is already spending over $2.75 million per year on just Zook and his two coordinators alone.
The gripes are routine? Saint Tate yet again thumbs his nose at fans.He's never liked them anyway. But he's right on one thing: this team is going nowhere. It's already at nowhere. Zook has been in over his head. Time for big changes. Get the broom and sweep it clean. At least the cheerleading from sportwriters may be about over.
It was the Keystone Cops all over the field. I swear, if Denard Robinson had walked over to an Illini player and tried to hand him the ball the Illini player would have fumbled it back to Robinson and committed a penalty somehow in the process. Meanwhile, Zook roams the sidelines with his best Dave Wannstedt in anguish looks. He's a good man, but more suited to be an NFL assistant.
If you continue to call pass plays but end up having Sheel look once and then take off running you will never be successful. Never. We run more out of the Shotgun then pass. We never hardly ever hand off when under center. IT IS BASSACKWARDS. It is Zook. Regarding the return game, whew, there are high school programs better coached, with better return guys. Enough of Zook, This is what you get with bad recruiting. Zook knows it. He is media guy, telling us how and why it happend, never telling us he is the reason. We will lose to Minnestoa by 2 touchdowns.
I did notice Zook nervously up and down on the sidelines. While I am sure Michigan saw this it sends a bad signal to our team. He looks confused, worried, pacing back and forth. It shows, it is a sense of what is really to come...a change hopefully. I am sure Thomas was also watching.
I'm so disgusted with this team, this coaching staff and the entire football program. It's really sad when everyone in my section is expecting the Illini to fail and joking about their ineptitude. I will NOT be renewing my season tickets if Zook is still HC next season.
I'll say this. Mike Thomas (I assume is at every game) was at this game, and as the team walked back into the locker room after the game, Mike Thomas ran over and had a chat with Zook. It looked like Thomas was really giving Zook an earful, and Zook did not look happy.
I too will not be buying season tickets next year, unless we have another head coach. I would rather pay to watch a team go 0-12 with another coach, than pay to see our team guaranteed to go 6-6 or worse with Zook. At least with another, but crappy, coach, we have a hope of something good.
Koenig's side of the ball is not a major problem, even yesterday (look at what led to all the second half points: fumbled punt, long interception return, failed on-side kick with a tack-on penalty), but calling only a 3 man rush that led to that 24-7 touchdown was a coach's decision as was going to it against Penn State, and I wonder which coach is making that call?
As the late Hank Stram said, the only thing the prevent defense prevents is winning.
I love watching the volleyball team, and you're right the women's basketball team isn't very good. But why are you comparing them? Why does support for the volleyball team need to take support away from women's basketball? Besides what would writing more checks do for the volleyball team? I'm not sure they could get any better. Do they need better practice facilities or something? If they do I hope they get what they need to continue their awesomeness, but you don't do that by backing away from the women's basketball team. If the women's basketball team isn't any good then you work on making it good.









Comments
IlliniHQ.com embraces discussion of Illini sports. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. we reserve the right to remove any comment at its discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.